But there are some other changes – both big and small – that differentiate it from the Aston Martin car that was last rolled out in Miami.

First up, the team has introduced a new rear wing configuration, with an onus on increasing downforce for the challenges posed by both the Circuit de Barcelona-Catalunya and Monaco that the wings already at its disposal wouldn’t have resolved.

The design is most closely aligned to the one used in Bahrain, with the elements filling up more of the legality box and being angled more steeply too.

The team has also used different downforce offerings at the other circuits, with a spoon-shaped design to help reduce downforce and drag was deployed at both Jeddah and Miami, and a more conventional shape was favoured in Imola.

Aston Martin AMR22 rear wing comparison

There have also been several changes to the halo and its fairing, not least the change from green paint in the front section to black instead, which begs the question why it didn’t choose to save even more weight and just leave it carbonfibre.

The team also mounted a new pair of fins on the rear upper section of the halo for FP1 that they removed during the session (red arrow), whilst another fin has been added ahead of the rear mounting (blue arrow), which is likely an improvement based on the side-mounted winglet that’s been taken on and off the car during the first few races (purple arrow).

Aston Martin AMR22 Halo winglets

Moving down the car, the first elements that we come across that bear all the hallmarks of the Red Bull RB18 design philosophy is Aston Martin’s switch to the twin outer floor strake layout that, until now, had been individual to Red Bull.

Aside from them being stacked next to one another they also feature a stepped design ahead of the transition into the floor, which should produce vortices that interact with one another and increase performance locally and downstream.

The extent of similarities between the Aston Martin updates and Red Bull’s RB18 saw the FIA carry out an investigation into the matter.

F1’s governing body said that during a “routine pre-event legality check” of the planned Aston Martin updates, “it became apparent that a number of features on the Aston Martin resembled those of another Competitor”, triggering an investigation relating to reverse engineering and "potential illicit IP transfer”.

Through the investigation, the FIA found Aston Martin had complied with the regulations through its process, making the new updates legal.

Aston Martin AMR22 side detail

By far the biggest change made by Aston Martin in Spain is the sidepods, as it becomes the first team to make a U-turn and produce something similar to another challenger in a quest for more performance.

The challenges posed by such an undertaking should not be underestimated either, as it has not only required an aerodynamic rethink of the external surfaces but also adaptation of the internal layout of the heat exchangers, electronics and ancillaries housed within the sidepods.

In its original guise the AMR22’s sidepod internals (inset below) were much more reclined, which resulted in the hanging sidepod bodywork solution that provided a large undercut for the airflow to make an unobstructed journey along the car’s flank.

In order to better manage the airflow at the rear of the car, the designers also incorporated large cooling gills on the sidepod’s upper surface.

Aston Martin AMR22 radiator layout comparison

The new configuration largely does away with this arrangement, as the internal components have been reoriented, with the heat exchangers inclined so they take up a more conventional position within.

As a consequence the inlet has also been pushed back, which the team hopes will still provide the necessary flow to cool the internals but also influence the external airflow more effectively too.

This is aided by the team's approach to the shape of the bodywork that surrounds the inlet, with the overall design clearly influenced by the Red Bull RB18 but requiring its own take in order to extract the performance it is looking for. For example, the RB18 has an extended lip ahead of the inlet, which creates an open top, increasing the volume of air that can be captured but the AMR22’s version does not.

The shoulder of the sidepod also has more of a bluff surface than its Red Bull counterpart, as the Aston Martin designers look for their own way in which to push the tyre wake laterally that it encounters.

There is some similarity in the design of the wing mirror housing, the stalks and the ancillary winglets that grow from them. But whereas the RB18’s wing mirror sits astride the outer sidepod boundary winglet, the AMR22’s does not as it remains independent of it.

The large forward undercut and Z-shaped downwash contouring seen on Red Bull’s sidepods is also present on the Aston Martin which bleeds into another region where we can now see similarities between the two: the floor edge.

Aston Martin had already deployed an edge wing at the more central point of the floor but it has been transformed to align with the sidepods’ new, wider waistline and features a slot ahead of a wavy section before the floor tapers away ahead of the rear tyre.

It’s also worth noting that while much of the heat rejection duty now falls on the enlarged rear cooling outlet, the team still has the option to open up cooling on the side of the car, with a similar design to the Red Bull employed here once again, and there are also options of how much of those cooling gills needs to be opened up in order that aerodynamic performance isn’t compromised.

Aston Martin AMR22 bodywork detail

Aston Martin AMR22 rear detail

Leclerc will "think twice" about driving historic F1 cars after Monaco crash

Fuel system issue forces Ferrari into Sainz F1 chassis change

Canadian GP: F1 technical developments from Montreal

How F1 teams combatted porpoising and unleashed performance

Why Alpine's low-drag F1 updates should pay off in the short term

Aston Martin discovers engine issue related to Stroll's qualifying woes

Vettel: Aston Martin 'green Red Bull' reaction "not fair"

What's next for the Green Red Bull controversy?

F1 Canadian GP: Alonso leads wet FP3 from Gasly and Vettel

Leclerc to start Canadian GP from back of the grid

Live: F1 Canadian GP commentary and updates – Qualifying

Mercedes to remove second floor stay amid F1 protest threat

How F1's ingenious ignition revolution brought an instant power boost

Former Mercedes powertrains boss Andy Cowell used to say “it all starts with the bonfire”. PAT SYMONDS explains how clever ignition technology delivered a massive advantage

The long-run data that offers Ferrari hope in Canada amid Leclerc engine pain

Max Verstappen headed both Canadian Grand Prix practice sessions, as Charles Leclerc faces a 10-place grid penalty after his Baku blowout. Although those signs point to Red Bull dominating the Formula 1 proceedings in Montreal, Ferrari can bring itself into play if it can deliver on the promise of its long runs

Why ‘unfair’ F1 porpoising rule change needs to be looked at

With the considerable levels of bouncing experienced at the Azerbaijan Grand Prix, drivers have called for changes to ease the stress on their backs. But equally, the Formula 1 teams with cars less susceptible to it are unlikely to accept any differences in the rules, feeling it punishes those who got the 2022 regs right. Both sides to the argument have merit - and the FIA must find a middle ground

The pandemic legacy that could threaten a vital motor racing tenet

Remote working was a necessary evil early in the pandemic, says MARK GALLAGHER, but it makes digging out F1’s secrets that much harder

Where a key Leclerc strength is obscuring the true nature of F1 2022

OPINION: After clinching pole in Baku, Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc ended the first third of Formula 1 2022 with six poles to one each for his Red Bull rivals. But this doesn’t reflect important traits differentiating the season’s leading cars – here’s why

Would Leclerc have won in Baku had his Ferrari survived?

Charles Leclerc's second engine problem in three races meant Max Verstappen had a free run to claim his fifth win of the 2022 Formula 1 season. Whether Leclerc would have been able to repel the Red Bull driver's charge on much older tyres is a question we'll never know the answer to. However, there are some clues from the in-race data that we can infer from

Azerbaijan Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2022

Formula 1 has never had a repeat winner at Baku, and that trend continued this year as Max Verstappen avenged his 2021 tyre blowout to lead a Red Bull 1-2. Here's Autosport's take on the weekend's best performers

How Ferrari's latest implosion stitched up a plausible Baku upset

Ferrari wasn't expected to be capable of challenging Red Bull on the streets of Baku, but Charles Leclerc took pole for the second year in a row and had assumed the lead when his engine expired. That left Max Verstappen and Red Bull doubly grateful as not only were its blushes spared, but it came away with a 1-2 and extended advantages in both championship standings